|
Post by sly (Team Helltrack) on May 12, 2021 13:58:48 GMT -5
Agreed. COVID is a bit of an outlier but I also think the waiver wire is plenty big enough to expand another spot. For both teams looking to win, or rebuilding teams to hold another prospect. Maybe let's field the disadvantages of this? Perhaps I'm not seeing it clearly.
|
|
|
Post by C-Low(The Panthers) on May 14, 2021 10:08:18 GMT -5
We definitely need IR spots. It sewered a bunch of teams in the playoffs this year.
|
|
|
Post by youngstar (Scorpions) on May 15, 2021 6:09:13 GMT -5
I like the idea of an injury replacement player for players ruled out for the season - sign a player for the rest of the season for $0.
|
|
|
Post by oldno7 (Rockafellas) on May 22, 2021 7:21:25 GMT -5
NBA roster rules are different now. 2 way contracts, larger rosters. Would make sense to have 1 or 2 IL spots.
|
|
|
Post by stick (Disastercycle) on May 25, 2021 5:32:04 GMT -5
What if we added a roster spot and started doing daily subs instead of weekly
|
|
|
Post by ucf (Air Republic) on May 25, 2021 19:49:18 GMT -5
I prefer the weekly lineups personally. There’s enough teams in here who probably wouldn’t manage their rosters daily imo.
An IL spot with players only on a one year deal would be my preference.
|
|
|
Post by oldno7 (Rockafellas) on May 30, 2021 11:46:09 GMT -5
I am ok with daily or weekly
|
|
|
Post by sly (Team Helltrack) on May 30, 2021 13:42:26 GMT -5
I prefer weekly lineups myself ... but whether that extra spot is an IL spot or just an additional bench spot, it would add a lot of value to managers who are trying to compete, IMO.
|
|
|
Post by stick (Disastercycle) on Jun 25, 2021 6:23:48 GMT -5
Would just adding 2 injured spots, for actual injured players solve it?
|
|
|
Post by ucf (Air Republic) on Jun 25, 2021 6:33:28 GMT -5
Would just adding 2 injured spots, for actual injured players solve it? Yes imo. The contracts of those players would be what I’d want to discuss.
|
|
|
Post by stick (Disastercycle) on Jun 25, 2021 16:21:11 GMT -5
I'd say, give everyone 2 free injury contracts to sign (and later waive) with no risk, after the 2 it goes closer to ta regular contract
|
|
|
Post by oldno7 (Rockafellas) on Jun 25, 2021 18:00:49 GMT -5
Decent compromise
|
|
|
Post by sly (Team Helltrack) on Jun 25, 2021 21:38:14 GMT -5
As in... they can stash on the IL... and bid on a FA with everyone else (but Year 1: min / Year 2: FA) status?
|
|
|
Post by stick (Disastercycle) on Jun 26, 2021 6:57:52 GMT -5
As in... they can stash on the IL... and bid on a FA with everyone else (but Year 1: min / Year 2: FA) status? Yes. With a limit on how many times you can do that
|
|
|
Post by sly (Team Helltrack) on Jun 26, 2021 10:27:07 GMT -5
Okay - so bid can be as high as they have room for, they can be outbid, but they are FA next year regardless? I.e. if extension happens, it doesn't apply? And I assume non-tradeable. One thing to note is high priced, long contracts that are sitting on the wire due to negative value have quite a bit of value in this scenario. Like top-75 talent will likely be available.
|
|